Saturday, October 17, 2026Scoutari
Log inSign up
Sign up
ModelsAPI pricingSkill RadarSavedPersonalizeSubmit sourceLog in
Back to timeline

Sat, October 1706:06AgentAI codingAI coding guide

Claude Code Team Shares Code Review Practice: Review Shifts from Endpoint Gate to Continuous Process

View original

Decision Brief

What changedThree members of the Claude Code team shared on Simon Willison's blog how they do code review, noting that review has shifted from a pre-commit endpoint gate into a process running continuously while code is written.
Why it mattersCode review moving from a gate at the end of a PR to a continuous process means Claude reviews and fixes most routine errors before humans step in, directly changing commit habits and team review roles for Claude Code developers.
Who should careAgent builders, AI coding tool users
Affected stackClaude Code
Source confidenceMedium · Reliable media or first-hand reporting

Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, writing on Simon Willison's blog, cited the Claude Code team's approach to code review. They argue that asking "has a human read this code" doesn't accurately predict what might go wrong with a change or which checks—automated or manual—should catch it. That question also shifts when review happens. Review used to be a gate at the end of the process: write code, open a PR, wait for a colleague to look. Now review runs continuously, more like a spell-checker while writing. Most changes have already been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before reaching a human. For developers using Claude Code, routine errors are caught before human involvement, freeing team attention for higher-level concerns and finer-grained checks.

Summary basis: full article readCompiled from the source scope noted above; the original remains authoritative.

Sources

  • Simon Willison：Blog

    Hands-on notes on LLM tools, local models, and practical AI engineering.

  • Simon Willison：Blog

Related intel

留言

登入后即可留言，和其他 builder 交换实测心得。

还没有留言，抢头香。